Corruption at Veteran Affairs North Chicago, Illinois

The full True story Behind The Corruption & Cover-Ups Exhisting within the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Police Adminsitration at Captain James Lovell FHCC, And Who has Helped?

 

Just recently many if not most employees were easily made aware of the wrongdoing regarding employee Civil Rights who were and are violated by a certain high-ranking member of the VA Police Department who is a trained Federal Law Enforcement Officer located at Captain James Lovell FHCC.

What No One is Made Aware Of, is who is Knowingly & Willfully Helping Cover-Up the Numerous Wrongdoings that has and is occurring to this Day?

I would ask the people who have full involvement with helping Captain Arturo Fuentes get away with his wrongdoing. 

I would start with Commander Walter Colvin who is a member of the DOD U.S. Navy, and Stephanie Vickers who knowingly assisted by lying numerous times via email regarding documents Stephanie Vickers has received as an EOC Specialist and closed numerous cases for Civil Rights Violations that Captain Arturo Fuentes has conducted. Both Commander Walter Colvin and EOC Specialist Stephanie Vickers were and are not only a Conflict of Interest, but both are in Federal Violations. 

Commander Walter Colvin knows about all the wrongdoing Mr. Captain Arturo Fuentes has illegally conducted. Starting from Sexual Harassment to female employees, Falsifying Government Documents, forcing lower ranked officers to assist with conducting Civil Rights Violations, ordering lower ranked officers to assist with placing their names regarding illegal Civil Rights Violations Captain Arturo Fuentes has conducted. Prior Disorderly Conduct record.

Its Certain that Commander Walter Colvin admitted to assigning Captain Arturo Fuentes to the Director Suite to work directly for him while fully knowing that he was the person conducting the Federal Administrative Investigation into Captain Arturo Fuentes when Commander Walter Colvin knowingly admitted to stating “He’s My Guy” and knowingly admitted to closing a Federal Administrative Investigation due to his “Conflict of Interest” 

Commander Walter Colvin knowingly refused to remove himself from conducting a Federal Administrative Investigation as a “Conflict of Interest”, which he is knowingly allowing that Person of High Rank to return in Full Police Capacity, which will allow that person to continue violating employee civil rights

 REGARDING THAT SPECIFIC HIGH-RANKING OFFICER

 

HINTS

1. Who Else has Knowingly and Willfully assisted with Cover-Ups which allowed Captain Arturo Fuentes to maintain his employment even after violating federal Civil Rights and Laws?

2Where should a Concerned Citizen who is a Government Employee go to if they were made aware of this information?

 

A. Would I go to Human Resources? NO

B. Would I go Internal EOC? NO

C. After not receiving full assistance from AFGE Union especially after they knowing cannot help anyone now? NO  

 

Whistleblower:

For those who understands Civil Rights Violations, also has an understanding to the meaning of Whistleblower. What is a Whistleblower? What is the meaning of Whistleblower? Who falls under that meaningof Whistleblower? Are you actually protected by the Government who is YOUR known employer as a Whistleblower? And who actually cares about you?

The Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989 (5 U.S.C. § 2302) is a key federal law designed to protect federal employees from retaliation when they disclose information regarding illegal or improper activities within their agencies. This includes reporting violations of laws, rules, or regulations, as well as instances of gross mismanagement, waste of funds, abuse of authority, or substantial dangers to public health and safety. 

 

The answer is simple. You Are the Whistleblower, and NO, You Are NOTProtected at Captain James Lovell FHCC, as a Whistleblower after presenting your legal,verbal, written statement and evidenceprovided.

If you were actually cared for & protected, then why are you still watching over both of your shoulders Daily?

 

Laws are easily written in Black &White for a reason, Security & Safety. Whos? THEIRS!

The Federal Government knowingly provides those (YOU) that feels are in the right of Security & Safety, with the Governments version of THEIR SECURITY & SAFETY.They are known as Standard Operational Policies, and or Standard Operational Procedures, Directives, State & Federal Laws/Statutes! 

A version of writes that are written in Black & White in order to stop receive the least amount of complaints possible, but refused to stop the Federal Laws & Civil Rights that have been are broken by those of high ranks(s) and authority & within other department(s) on the grounds of Captain James Lovell FHCC.

 

Where does the ranking of those SOP’s Directives, State & Federal Laws start? 

Does the ranking start from the bottom and moves its way up?

Or does the ranking correctly start from the Top and if needed, questioned those who are victim(s) and move from there? I’lllet you figure out!

 

Let’s take a close look at the RANK!

Does Rank come from a Military Version?

Does DOD Military Officer have authority over VA Police at Captain James Lovell?

Where is the Federal SOP’s, Directives, showing members belonging to the DOD U.S, Navy have belonging to a U.S. Military Branch, any and or all authority over VA Police?

Are members of the DOD U.S. Navy appointed positions by the Director of the Captain James Lovell FHCC?

If any member(s) of the DOD U.S. Navy are appointed positions by the Director of the Captain James Lovell FHCC, where is it written in the AFGE Union Master Agreement where the AFGE was fully made aware that members belonging to the DOD U.S. Navy from a U.S> Military Branch, have full authority over a Federal Civilian Law Enforcement Agency? 

Does Rank Come from SOP’s, Directives, Laws?

Does rank come from Certain Department(s)within the grounds of Captain James Lovell FHCC?

If the rank comes from Certain Department(s)who are also on shared grounds of Captain James Lovell FHCC, does that allow the member(s) belonging to those Certain Department(s) INCLUDING THOSE BUT ARE LIMITED TO HIGH RANKING OFFICER(s) BELONGING TO THE DOD U.S. NAVY who are also on shared grounds of Captain James Lovell FHCC?

Is the use of different addresses that are not on the grounds of Captain James Lovell FHCC during ANY AND OR ALL ACTIONS TAKEN TOWARDS AND OR AGAINST GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES BELONGING TO THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS LOCATED AT CAPTAIN JAMES LOVELL FHCCALLOWED AS A USE OF INTIMIDIATION? 

 

Under the Secretary of Veterans Affairs Washington, Delegation. It States:

This Memorandum delegates to the Under Secretary for the Health the Authority assigned to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs is Section 1701(a) of P.L. 111-84, including the authority to execute a signed agreement pursuant to section 706 of P.L. 110-417 for the joint use by the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs of FHCC and Medical Personal Property and Equipment relating to FHCC.

No where in the Memorandum states – ANY and or ALL Member(s) regardless of Ranking(s), have ANY and or ALL Authority and or ANY and or ALL Joint use of or over the Veterans Affairs Police or Chief of Police of the FHCC.

 

Federal Law: Under 42 U.S. Code § 3617, it is unlawful to coerce, intimidate, or interfere with any person in the exercise of their rights. 

U.S. DOJ 

CRM 500 – 999

914. Concealment –Failure to Disclose

Concealment and cover-up are essentially identical concepts and often result from falsification. These acts need not have any relation to a statement or representation. A concealment may involve a failure to disclose or partial disclosures of information required on an application form; however, when using such a theory, the government must prove that the defendant had a duty to disclose the facts in question at the time of the alleged concealment of them. United States v. Irwin, 654 F.2d 671, 678-79 (10th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1016 (1982). Concealment may also involve a merely physical act of concealment such as transferring inspection stamps, changing numbers on bottles to conceal rejection, conceal use of certain drugs, or using false stamps to conceal ownership of tobacco. Some courts have required that the government be prepared to prove that the "concealment by trick" consisted of affirmative acts. United States v. London, 550 F.2d 206 (5th Cir. 1977